Jump to content

Talk:Straight to Hell (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Straight to hell dvdcover.jpg

[edit]

Image:Straight to hell dvdcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Cult Status"

[edit]

"While the film received few positive reviews, it has achieved cult status." Uh, as certified by what - the American Institute for Cult Status Certification? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.230.177.44 (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose that the soundtrack stub article be merged into this main article. The other article has so little content, it can easily be merged here without swelling this article too much. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 02:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Maybe use the {{Track listing}} template? Erik (talk | contribs) 02:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Characters in movie inaccurately referred to as prostitutes in article

[edit]

But in my viewing of the movie, none of the characters referred to are identified in any way as prostitutes. I'm going to edit this correction, but I wanted to open this talk section in case someone disagrees and wants to discuss.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevemidgley (talkcontribs) 22:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]